Latest News

Contract Clinches Fee for Ex-Advisers Read more
Businessmen Denied Profit for 'Borrowed' Business Plan Read more
Fines for Breaches of Environmental Law Read more
Tough New Penalties for Bribery Read more
Corporate Manslaughter Case Adjourned Read more
Government Demands You Pay Faster Too! Read more
New Advertising Codes Published Read more
Borrowing Advice for Businesses Read more
24/7 WebCHeck Service Read more
Insurance Claim Rejected Due to Misrepresentation Read more

Freezing Orders

As anyone who has ever tried to collect a debt knows, there is a big difference between obtaining judgment and obtaining payment.

In difficult cases, one of the ways a debtor can be encouraged to pay is by the creditor obtaining a freezing order against his or her assets: this is a court order which prevents the subject of it from disposing of assets or removing them from the country. It is often described as a ‘nuclear option’, because of the effect it has on the subject of the order, and is only granted in serious cases. If an application for a freezing order turns out to be inappropriate, it is normal for the applicant to bear both their own and the debtor’s legal costs.

To obtain a freezing order, the person owed the money will first have to establish that there is a good case for a sum being due and then show that there is a real risk that the debtor will dissipate the assets over which a freezing order is sought.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.